Detailed analytics associated with sexual habits of the full test and the three subsamples of productive users, previous users, and you may low-profiles
Getting solitary decreases the amount of exposed full sexual intercourses
In regard to the number of partners with whom participants had protected full sex during the last year, the ANOVA revealed a significant difference between user groups (F(2, 1144) = , P 2 = , Cramer’s V = 0.15, P Figure 1 represents the theoretical model and the estimate coefficients. The model fit indices are the following: ? 2 = , df = 11, P 27 the fit indices of our model are not very satisfactory; however, the estimate coefficients of the model resulted statistically significant for several variables, highlighting interesting results and in line with the reference literature. In Table 4 , estimated regression weights are reported. The SEM output showed that being active or former user, compared to being non-user, has a positive statistically significant effect on the number of unprotected full sexual intercourses in the last 12 months. The same is for the age. All the other independent variables do not have a statistically significant impact.
Efficiency away from linear regression model entering demographic, dating apps use and you can purposes from installment variables given that predictors getting what number of secure full sexual intercourse’ partners one of active users
Yields from linear regression model typing market, dating software utilize and you may objectives out of installations details because the predictors to possess what amount of protected full sexual intercourse’ partners among energetic pages
Hypothesis 2b A second multiple regression analysis was run to predict the number of unprotected full sex partners for active users. The number of unprotected full sex partners was set as the dependent variable, while the same demographic variables and dating apps usage and their motives for app installation variables used in the first regression analysis were entered as covariates. The final model accounted for a significant proportion of the variance in the number of unprotected full sex partners among active users (R 2 = 0.16, Adjusted R 2 = 0.14, F-change(step 1, 260) = 4.34, P = .038). In contrast, looking for romantic partners or for friends, and being male were negatively associated with the number of unprotected sexual activity partners. Results are reported in Table 6 .
Trying to find sexual partners, numerous years of software usage, being heterosexual was indeed surely of this level of exposed complete sex people
Efficiency regarding linear regression design typing market, relationships applications utilize and you can objectives out of installations details because predictors to own what number of exposed complete sexual intercourse’ couples certainly dama somalijski effective pages
Looking sexual people, years of app utilization, being heterosexual were seriously associated with the amount of exposed complete sex lovers
Returns of linear regression model typing group, relationship programs usage and you may motives out of installations parameters since predictors for the amount of exposed complete sexual intercourse’ lovers certainly active users
Hypothesis 2c A third multiple regression analysis was run, including demographic variables and apps’ pattern of usage variables together with apps’ installation motives, to predict active users’ hook-up frequency. The hook-up frequency was set as the dependent variable, while the same demographic variables and dating apps usage variables used in the previous regression analyses were entered as predictors. The final model accounted for a significant proportion of the variance in hook-up frequency among active users (R 2 = 0.24, Adjusted R 2 = 0.23, F-change(1, 266) = 5.30, P = .022). App access frequency, looking for sexual partners, having a CNM relationship style were positively associated with the frequency of hook-ups. In contrast, being heterosexual and being of another sexual orientation (different from hetero and homosexual orientation) were negatively associated with the frequency of hook-ups. Results are reported in Table 7 .